tv [untitled] March 5, 2014 6:30pm-7:01pm PST
york. i wanted to see what san francisco is doing with infrastructure. >> cities are where people are living these days. the bay area is doing a lot with construction and the way to change the world starts here. >> we are about to take a bike ride. we have 30 cyclist. i'm really excited to hit the road and see what the city has in store.
>> all right. good morning, everyone and welcome to the board of supervisors budget & finance committee for wednesday, march 5, 2014. my name is supervisor farrell i'll be chairing this committee i'm joined bill supervisor avalos and we'll be joined by supervisor mar as well >> madam clerk, any announcements? please silence all electronic devices.
and items appearing on today's agenda will be on the next meeting. >> call item one. >> llc to have the are replacement services not to exceed $60,200,000. >> we have dph here. >> i'm the deputy financial officer this is for uncommon sat down care or recovery this contract represents medi-cal appeals and they evaluate be patients for eligible and they assist us with the services we typically can't recover that with without their just an
$34 million is the estimated amount and after we pay fees to the krashlth it's a net revenue of 28 million to dph. thank you very much colleagues, any questions mr. rose your report please. >> thanks madam chair on page 4 we reported the fee payments for medi-cal replacements to be made by the dph for the contract are $5 million $300,000 plus in table 4 of our report and on page 5 we report that the contract includes a amount of $33 million for replacements.
so the total estimated payment to help are $600 million which is 4 hundred and 19 thousand not to exceed the contract will amount of $600,000 plus so therefore our recommendation on page 5 is to reduce the not to exceed contract of $4 million to $67 million 3 hundred thousand plus and we recommend you approve the resolution as amended >> colleagues, any questions. public comment any comment on item 1 seeing none, public comment is closed. we have some recommendations do i have a motion to accept >> can we take those 1 o'clock. and the motion to approve those >> so moved.
>> madam chair i'd like to ask the department submit the adjustment for tomorrow morning. >> so at the 9:00 a.m. tomorrow. >> yes. thank you very much madam clerk, call item 2. >> it's approving the execution of the building in the plot 90 between southwest airlines and the city of san francisco with the rental amount of $104 million 3 hundred thousand for the boards approval. >> thank you. we have ms. wagon we have commented you should have an office here at this point. >> i thought you were going to say i hadn't been here for a few weeks. >> the we did. >> this is for the south west
airlines for 4 hundred plus square foot ever cargo warehouses space in order for the airline to conduct it's cargo operation. southwest has been operating on a permanent basis and this 5 year lease will lock in a structure they currently pay the airport 2 hundred thousand flue plus a year and this is subject to the annual adjustments based on the calculations. the airport has a guaranteed rent of 1 had the $3 million of the 5 year term and the budget analysis office recommended approval if you have any questions, i'll be happy to answer them >> thank you. any questions.
mr. rose our report please. yes madam chair and members of the committee consistent with her comments on page 8 on the bottom summarized in the table one southwest pays $362,000 for airport building 606 that's $28,000 plus a month. under the proposed new lease they'll continue to pay the same amount of rent but that will be subject to the airports subject annual rate adjustments so they'll pay nine hundred 213 61 at least for the is square feet of the ramp and that concludes annual rent we recommend you approve that >> thank you. any questions.
seeing none, public comment on item 2? seeing none, public comment is closed. colleagues, we have this item before us can i have a motion >> so moved. >> city clerk 3 items together. >> the administrator code for the administration in this area are considered local for the participation for the cities local hiring policy on certain locations item 4 is the resolution to expend the period review of the city's local policy and to determine the policy. >> i'll hand this over to the supervisor avalos. thank you chair farrell those who pieces of legislation
legislation are the local hire ordinances that was passed by different configurations of the board. the board can weigh in on the local hire issues before i talk this this is a resolution that would keep the mandatory percentage at the thirty percent while the city does a review period to see how the program for local hiring is working. the program review will look at the pipeline building and the workers and what perhaps with the contractors and what concerns from the contractors and ways we can see the troublg shoot any program features.
we want to make sure we're providing the workers to meet the mandate. it make sense to keep it another thirty percent if we did nothing the mandate would rise on march 23rd of this year. it's something i said we'd do back in 2010 there was concern that we were doing this right and i thought we would study it before we ramp up we're at the time now. i hope you support this resolution and in view of the workers in their supportive of this measure. the item number 3 is related to projects that are in the jurisdiction of the public utilities commission. it's my intention that we would extend the local hire principal
to areas in the region that pay for the infrastructure that we're developing. instead of actually doing that we created a 70 mile jurisdiction boundary of the united states that covers a lot of the public utilities projects and we feel the public utilities commission came forward with a defined region where rate pairs are paying and it extends beyond the 70 mile radius so essentially this will allow for workers outside the 70 mile boundary but whose region is paying they'll have access to the jobs that are being created in the service service of the public utilities commission i don't believe there's an item report on item 3 and if anyone
is here to talk about the department we have pat here to talk about item 4 and perhaps 3 i can call him up to talk about item 4 >> thank you. the extent in the legislation review are period allows the office workforce development to have better data to accommodate 12 months of data. there's a significant lag time in how our office requires the data the percentage is based on the advertising date sometimes 6 to 12 months and an additional two most. so at this point it's different to measure the impact of thirty percent and it's important to
have that benefit. with regard it the 70 million provision there were provisions in the original provision we speak to the agreements that worked for san mateo community because of the nature of the puc territory it crosses any counties so thank you, supervisor >> thanks any future comments. okay. we don't have a budget analyst report anyone wishes to comment on items three or four can you do that? walter welcome back >> it's been a hard budget day and you've been working like a dog. it's been a hard budget day and i know budget you're going to
my. but when i come home to you and the budget is all new you know you'll make it, all right. . when we're budget home everything seems to be right. when we're budget home it's going to be budget right, right, right yeah. we're going to budget really good we're going to have a really high rate and it's worth it just to hear you say that your budget is going to pay but why on earth should we money because the budget is in the city doom it's going to be all right. the budget is going to be all right. >> thank you walter anyone else
for public comment seeing none, public comment is closed. all right. colleagues, we have those items before us sponsored by supervisor avalos can i have a motion >> i'd like to be added as a co-sponsor of both and move we support into both items. >> okay. we have commissioner dooley's as co-sponsor item 5. >> item 5 is the resolution retroactively authorizing the police department to spend approximately 2 hundred and thirty thousand 40 from the governor's for the fantastic force program. >> okay. thank you very much welcome back. >> i'm with the san francisco police department i was going to say this but walter